Vasquez-Angulo v. United States of America
Petitioner: Jose Vasquez Angulo and Jose Vasquez-Angulo
Respondent: United States of America and Freddy Garrido
Case Number: 4:2023cv00706
Filed: July 11, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 24, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER PERMITTING PROCEEDING IN THE DISTRICT COURT AND ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the petition and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ for Freddy Garrido added. Deadline to reply to the answer is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/24/2023) (bdb)
August 24, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Thu Aug 24 11:38:47 CDT 2023 (crt)
August 22, 2023 Filing 7 Mail returned as undeliverable. #4 Order And Notice of Deficiency,, received back from Jose Vasquez Angulo as Released, Forwarding Expired. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (sre)
August 2, 2023 Filing 6 ***Disregard, order not to be entered per SA*** Docket text modified and pdf removed (twd).
August 2, 2023 NOTICE of Change of Name and BOP Number for Pro Se litigant Jose Vasquez-Angulo. Inserted hyphen into last name and corrected BOP number to #65376-298. Remailed #4 ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY to petitioner. (twd)
August 2, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Wed Aug 2 09:47:50 CDT 2023 (crt)
August 2, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Wed Aug 2 09:47:07 CDT 2023 (crt)
July 28, 2023 Filing 5 Mail returned as undeliverable. #2 Consent, #3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party received back from Jose Vasquez Angulo as Return to Sender - Forwarding Expired. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (bdb)
July 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Jose Vasquez Angulo must address the following deficiency: The $5.00 filing fee for habeas petitions has not been paid nor have an application to proceed in forma pauperis and certificate of inmate trust account reflecting the amount of funds in Petitioners inmate account been submitted. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/14/2023) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP Form w/CTA) (bdb)
July 14, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Jul 14 12:09:49 CDT 2023 (crt)
July 12, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Wed Jul 12 09:05:31 CDT 2023 (crt)
July 11, 2023 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (fba)
July 11, 2023 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (fba)
July 11, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Jose Vasquez Angulo. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (fba)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Vasquez-Angulo v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Vasquez Angulo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jose Vasquez-Angulo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Freddy Garrido
Represented By: Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?