Hlail v. Kehl et al
| Mohammed H. Hall and Mohammed H Hlail |
| Lisa Kehl, Ur M Jaddou, Michael Valverde, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher A Wray and Merrick B Garland |
| 4:2023cv00721 |
| July 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Terry R Means |
| Immigration: Naturalization Application |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Dismissal Notice of Nonsuit without Prejudice filed by Mohammed H Hlail (Attachments: #1 Order Granting Nonsuit without Prejudice) (Hlail, Mohammed) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mohammed H. Hall. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mmw) |
| Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Mohammed H. Hall. (Filing fee $402.00; receipt number 400001717) (mmw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Fri Jul 14 14:45:24 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
