Edwards v. The United States of America et al
| Ginger L. Edwards |
| The United States of America, CIA, United States Postal Service, Federal Prosecutors in Burk Burnett Bldg, Allied Security, Homeland Security Agent 1410, Supervisors and Clerks of the District Court, AT&T, TMobile, Q Link, SafeLink, Med Star, Fort Worth Fire Department No. 2 Firestation, Trinity Metro Bus Station, Zip Zone, Downtown Market on 711 Lamar, 7-11 on Summit, The Womens Center Hemphill, SafeHaven, One Safe Place, YMCA Downtown Fort Worth, The Taste Restaurant, Jesus Restaurant, Uncle Julios Mexican Restaurant and Financial Exploitation Prevention Center |
| 4:2023cv00908 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Hal R Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
Motion to Move this Case to a Higher Court filed by Ginger L. Edwards (wxc)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER: The plaintiff is now responsible for serving the defendants with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 9/12/2023) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Rule 4, #2 Additional Page(s) Summons Forms) (bdb)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION for Request for Federal Protection filed by Ginger L. Edwards. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Court Appointed Attorney filed by Ginger L. Edwards. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 6
Motion to Meet with Hon. Judge Pittman filed by Ginger L. Edwards (wxc)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Plaintiff shall pay the required $402 filing and administrative fees to the Clerk of Court on or before September 19, 2023. If she does not do so, the undersigned will recommend that the district judge deny her application to proceed in forma pauperis, and this case will be subject to dismissal without prejudice as provided by Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 9/5/2023) (sre)
|
|
Filing 4
Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 3
New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate No magistrate judge assigned preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Ginger L. Edwards. (bdb)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Ginger L. Edwards. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
