Robertson vs. Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-985-O
Mark Darrell Robertson |
State of Texas and Unknown Defendant 4:23-cv-985-O |
4:2023cv00985 |
September 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Terry R Means |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Mail returned as undeliverable. #7 Order, received back from Mark Darrell Robertson as Return to Sender - Attempted Not Known - Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (bdb) |
Filing 7 ORDER: If Robertson intends to proceed with this action, he must, within 20 days from the date of this order, file his complaint on the proper form and pay the $402 filing fee, file an application to proceed in forma pauperis, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement, or show good cause why he failed to comply with the Court's October 4 order. To the extent that Robertson seeks the appointment of counsel in his recent letter (ECF No. #6 ), his request is DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/9/2023) (bdb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Thu Nov 9 16:15:50 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 6 UNTITLED CORRESPONDENCE filed by Mark Darrell Robertson. (tjc) |
Filing 5 ORDER - Mark Darrell Robertson must address the following deficiency: Robertson has not paid the $402 filing fee or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP), this action shall not commence. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. In addition, Robertson did not file his complaint on the form required by the Court. See N.D. Tex. Misc. Order No. 14. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 11/3/2023. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 10/4/2023) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint Form, #2 IFP with Inmate Trust Account). (tjc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Oct 4 14:58:00 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 4 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Reed C. O'Connor for all further proceedings. Senior Judge Terry R Means no longer assigned to case. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 10/3/2023) (tjc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Tue Oct 3 10:49:18 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (tjc) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge Means. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (tjc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Fri Sep 29 14:05:00 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against State of Texas filed by Mark Robertson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (tjc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.