Vo v. Garrido
Long Vo |
Warden F.J. Garrido |
4:2023cv01000 |
October 2, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Appendix in Support filed by F.J. Garrido re #7 Response/Objection (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by F.J. Garrido re: #5 Order to Show Cause/Order to Answer,, (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by F.J. Garrido. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
Filing 5 ORDER AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: The clerk has served this order and will regenerate notice of the petition and supporting documents to the designated Assistant US Attorney. Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ for F.J. Garrido added. Respondent is directed to file an answer to this petition within 60 days of the date of this order. Petitioner may file a reply within 30 days from the date of service of Respondents answer, motion, or other pleading. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/3/2023) (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Oct 3 15:40:14 CDT 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Tue Oct 3 08:54:55 CDT 2023 (crt) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
Filing 2 Memorandum in Support filed by Long Vo re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sre) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Long Vo. (Filing fee $402.00; receipt number 402085) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Vo v. Garrido | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Long Vo | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Warden F.J. Garrido | |
Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.