Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company v. Smallwood et al
Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company |
Larry Smallwood d/b/a Electrical Solutions, I&A Development and Construction, Michelle Peguero, Individually and As Next Friend of K.P., A Minor, Machasity Peguero, Ruby Peguero, Larry Smallwood doing business as Electrical Solutions, I & A Development and Construction, LLC and Michelle Peguero |
4:2023cv01079 |
October 24, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Contract: Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Robert Earle Haslam on behalf of Machasity Peguero, Michelle Peguero, Ruby Peguero. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Haslam, Robert) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to #1 Complaint,,,, filed by I & A Development and Construction, LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney David A Johnson added to party I & A Development and Construction, LLC(pty:dft) (Johnson, David) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Larry Smallwood ; served on 12/7/2023. (Garcia, Rodrigo) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Ruby Peguero ; served on 12/5/2023. (Garcia, Rodrigo) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Michelle Peguero ; served on 12/5/2023. (Garcia, Rodrigo) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Machasity Peguero ; served on 12/5/2023. (Garcia, Rodrigo) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to I & A Development and Construction, LLC ; served on 12/5/2023. (Garcia, Rodrigo) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to I & A Development and Construction, LLC, Machasity Peguero, Michelle Peguero, Ruby Peguero, Larry Smallwood. (sre) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Culver, Christina) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Crum & Forster Specialty Insurance Company. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number ATXNDC-14125995) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Culver, Christina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.