Donald v. Bridgecrest
Henry Donald |
Bridgecrest |
4:2023cv01147 |
November 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Jeffrey L Cureton |
Mark Pittman |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT...This Final Judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. In accordance with the Court's Order (ECF No. #8 ) entered on December 6, 2023, it is ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a true copy of this Final Judgment to the Parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/8/2023) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Fri Dec 8 13:30:03 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 8 ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE... The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case. ECF No. #7 . No objections were filed, and the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is ripe for review. The District Judge reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the undersigned District Judge believes that the Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/6/2023) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Dec 6 09:43:48 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 10 Notice/Opportunity to Cure filed by Henry Donald (wxc) |
Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Bridgecrest filed by Henry Donald. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Filing 7 ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL AND RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE re: #1 Complaint filed by Henry Donald. Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton no longer assigned to case. Objections to F&R due by 12/5/2023. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 11/21/2023) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Tue Nov 21 10:40:08 CST 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Nov 14 10:12:37 CST 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Tue Nov 14 10:05:19 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 6 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FORM AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff Donald, no later than November 20, 2023, shall file a fully completed amended complaint form with any attachment pages, in accordance with the terms of this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 11/13/2023) (Attachments: #1 amended complaint) (mmw) |
Filing 5 ORDER : The Court GRANTS Plaintiff #2 leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 11/13/2023) (mmw) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (mmw) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Henry Donald (mmw) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Bridgecrest filed by Henry Donald. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Mon Nov 13 13:06:19 CST 2023 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Donald v. Bridgecrest | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Henry Donald | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Bridgecrest | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.