Jackson-Render v. USA
David Lamar Jackson-Render |
USA |
4:2023cv01185 |
November 20, 2023 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet: Motions to Vacate Sentence |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Court's order of dismissal entered this day and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is the final judgment of the Court that David Lamar Jackson-Render's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/4/2024) (bdb) |
Filing 4 ORDER: Movant's 28 U.S.C. 2255 motion is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/4/2024) (bdb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Thu Jan 4 15:04:50 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 3 ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: David Lamar Jackson-Render must address the following deficiency: The motion for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2255 is not on the proper form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 11/27/2023) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) 2255 Form) (bdb) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3. Mon Nov 27 10:52:01 CST 2023 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Wed Nov 22 10:19:08 CST 2023 (crt) |
Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (bdb) |
Filing 1 MOTION to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Criminal Case Number 4:20-cr-145-O) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
New Case Notes: A filing fee is not due for this case. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Jackson-Render v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: David Lamar Jackson-Render | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: USA | |
Represented By: | Frank L Gatto-DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.