Wright v. State Farm Lloyds
| Kenneth Wright |
| State Farm Lloyds |
| ADR Provider |
| 4:2023cv01248 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER...Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Appraisal and Abatement (ECF No. #8 ), filed January 17, 2024. The Court hereby REFERS the Motion and all related responses, replies, briefs in support, and appendices, etc., to United States Magistrate Judge Ray for hearing, if necessary, and determination or recommendation to this Court. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1). Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/8/2024) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 10
RESPONSE filed by State Farm Lloyds re: #8 MOTION (De Diego, Armando)
|
|
Filing 9
RESPONSE filed by State Farm Lloyds re: #8 MOTION (De Diego, Armando)
|
|
Filing 8
MOTION filed by Kenneth Wright (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dick, Eric)
|
|
Filing 7
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Kenneth Wright. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Dick, Eric)
|
|
Filing 6
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 3/11/2024. Amended Pleadings due by 3/11/2024. Motions due by 7/29/2024. Deadline for mediation is on or before 5/28/2024. Discovery due by 6/27/2024. Pretrial Order due by 10/30/2024. Jury Trial set for 11/25/2024 before Judge Reed C. O'Connor. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 1/10/2024) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 5
Joint STATUS REPORT Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order filed by State Farm Lloyds. (De Diego, Armando)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 1/16/2024. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/18/2023) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 4
New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (wxc)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by State Farm Lloyds. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (De Diego, Armando)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by State Farm Lloyds. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14250604) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s)) (De Diego, Armando)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
