Logan et al v. Logan
Plaintiff: Henry Logan and Hannah Logan
Defendant: Peggy Logan
Case Number: 4:2023cv01252
Filed: December 18, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Cureton
Referring Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 19, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Fri Jan 19 12:33:49 CST 2024 (crt)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 FINAL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the Court's Dismissal Order issued this same date (ECF No. #10 ) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/18/2024) (mmw)
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/18/2024) (mmw)
January 18, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Thu Jan 18 14:40:53 CST 2024 (crt)
December 29, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER ACCEPTING THE FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court ADOPTS the Magistrate Judge's reasoning, ACCEPTS the #6 FCRs conclusions as the conclusions of the Court, and DENIES Plaintiffs' #2 request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, Plaintiffs are ORDERED to pay the applicable filing and administrative fees for this civil action on or before January 5, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/29/2023) (mmw)
December 29, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Dec 29 10:52:57 CST 2023 (crt)
December 26, 2023 Filing 7 OBJECTION filed by Hannah Logan, Henry Logan re: #6 Findings and Recommendations. (bdb)
December 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND NOTICE AND ORDER: It is therefore RECOMMENDED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis [ECF No. #2 ] be DENIED by the district judge. It is further RECOMMENDED that the district judge inform Plaintiffs that the complaint will be subject to dismissal without further notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(b), unless Plaintiffs pays to the clerk of Court the filing and administrative fees of $405.00 within seven (7) days after the district judge's order. It is ORDERED that Plaintiffs are granted until January 2, 2023, 2023 to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 12/19/2023) (saw)
December 19, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Dec 19 15:11:57 CST 2023 (crt)
December 18, 2023 Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw)
December 18, 2023 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (mmw)
December 18, 2023 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Hannah Logan, Henry Logan. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mmw)
December 18, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Hannah Logan, Henry Logan (mmw)
December 18, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Peggy Logan filed by Henry Logan, Hannah Logan. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw)
December 18, 2023 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Mon Dec 18 14:39:23 CST 2023 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Logan et al v. Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Henry Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hannah Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Peggy Logan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?