Matthews v. Bayer Motor Company, Inc.
| Britoni Matthews |
| Bayer Motor Company, Inc. |
| 4:2024cv00001 |
| January 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Kristina M Oropeza on behalf of Bayer Motor Company, Inc.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Oropeza, Kristina) |
Filing 12
ORDER...Defendant's local counsel is not listed as an attorney of record on the Court's electronic filing system (ECF). Accordingly, Defendant is ORDERED to update their records in ECF to reflect its compliance with Local Rule 83.10(a). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/22/2024) (wxc)
|
|
Filing 11
Order for Scheduling Order Proposal: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 3/7/2024. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/22/2024) (wxc)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Defendant's Rule 7.1 Disclosure of Interested Parties filed by Bayer Motor Company, Inc. (Wills, Linda) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,, filed by Bayer Motor Company, Inc.. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Wills, Linda) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 ...Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond. ECF No. #7 . Having considered the Motion, the Court concludes that it should be and is hereby GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the new deadline for Defendant to file its answer or respond to Plaintiff's Complaint is Wednesday, February 21, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/30/2024) (wxc)
|
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION to Extend Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint filed by Bayer Motor Company, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Defendant Bayer Motor Company's Unopposed Motion to Extend Deadline to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint)Attorney Linda P Wills added to party Bayer Motor Company, Inc.(pty:dft) (Wills, Linda) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Karen K Fitzgerald for Corinna Chandler on behalf of Britoni Matthews. (Fitzgerald, Karen) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Bayer Motor Company, Inc. ; served on 1/10/2024. (Fitzgerald, Karen) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Bayer Motor Company, Inc.. (mmw) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Britoni Matthews. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Fitzgerald, Karen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Bayer Motor Company, Inc. filed by Britoni Matthews. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14280062) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Fitzgerald, Karen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Matthews v. Bayer Motor Company, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Britoni Matthews | |
| Represented By: | Karen K Fitzgerald |
| Represented By: | Corinna Pia Chandler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bayer Motor Company, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kristina M Oropeza |
| Represented By: | Linda P Wills |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
