Nichols v. GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC
Plaintiff: Arlo Nichols
Defendant: GEV WIND POWER U.S., LLC
Case Number: 4:2024cv00053
Filed: January 16, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 14, 2024 Filing 7 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC (saw)
February 12, 2024 Filing 6 Request for Clerk to issue Entry of Default filed by Arlo Nichols. (Callahan, Brandon)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to move for entry of default against Defendant no later than February 26, 2024 and, upon entry of default, to file a motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b), the Court will dismiss the Complaint without prejudice if no such motion is filed. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/12/2024) (saw)
January 24, 2024 Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC ; served on 1/19/2024. (Callahan, Brandon)
January 17, 2024 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC. (bdb)
January 16, 2024 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb)
January 16, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against GEV WIND POWER U.S., LLC filed by Arlo Nichols. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14315305) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Callahan, Brandon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nichols v. GEV Wind Power U.S., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Arlo Nichols
Represented By: Benjamin Eric Casey
Represented By: Brandon C Callahan
Represented By: Fernando M Bustos
Represented By: Matthew Nephi Zimmerman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GEV WIND POWER U.S., LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?