Mullin v. Eventide Credit Acquisitions, LLC
| 4:2024cv00103 |
| May 14, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Fort Worth Office |
| Bankruptcy: Appeal 28 USC 158 |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Before the Court is Appellee Eventide Credit Acquisition's Motion to Dismiss Big Picture Loans, LLC's ("BPL") Appeal of the Arbitration Order as Frivolous. ECF No. 11 . The Court DENIES Eventide's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 11 ). (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/15/2024) (saw)
|
|
Filing
27
Memorandum Opinion and Order... The Court does not view the Stay Order by the Bankruptcy Court as an effective denial of BPL's right to arbitration and any concerns BPL has as to their rights to arbitration will be addressed in the Appeal of the Bankruptcy Court's Denial of their Motion to Dismiss under 12(b)(6) and to Compel Arbitration. Accordingly, BPL's Motion for Leave to Appeal the Order Denying their Motion for Relief from the Automatic Stay is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/14/2024) (wxc)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mullin v. Eventide Credit Acquisitions, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
