Ellis v. Ultimate Kronos Group (UKG)
| Eric L. Ellis |
| Ultimate Kronos Group (UKG) |
| 4:2024cv00112 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Jeffrey L Cureton |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Employment |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58 and the Court's electronic order accepting Plaintiff's voluntary dismissal (ECF No. 6 ), it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the above-styled civil action is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/7/2024) (sre)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #5 Motion to Dismiss. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 2/7/2024) (chmb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Wed Feb 7 08:56:09 CST 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Tue Feb 6 14:48:55 CST 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Plaintiffs' Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) filed by Eric L. Ellis (wxc) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (wxc) |
| Filing 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Eric L. Ellis (wxc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Ultimate Kronos Group (UKG) filed by Eric L. Ellis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ellis v. Ultimate Kronos Group (UKG) | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Eric L. Ellis | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Ultimate Kronos Group (UKG) | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
