Brandt et al v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
| Angela Brandt, Charleston K Brandt, Alexas N Brandt, Zackary C Brandt, David A Brandt, Charleston Kutter Brandt, Alexas Nicole Brandt, Zackary Carl Brandt and David Allen Brandt |
| Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, d/b/a Office of Federal Employees Group and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company doing business as Office of Federal Employees' Group |
| 4:2024cv00136 |
| February 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Contract: Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER: Before the Court is Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiffs' Complaint (ECF No. #6 ). The Court finds good cause to GRANT the requested extension. Defendant must file its answer or other responsive pleading by April 11, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/11/2024) (saw)
|
| Filing 6 Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer filed by Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Linda G Moore added to party Metropolitan Life Insurance Company(pty:dft) (Moore, Linda) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ; served on 2/20/2024. (McGarry, Charles) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Metropolitan Life Insurance Company. (bdb) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (bdb) |
| CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Alexas Nicole Brandt, Angela Brandt, Charleston Kutter Brandt, David Allen Brandt, Zackary Carl Brandt. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (See doc #1 for image) (bdb) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue summons filed by Alexas N Brandt, Angela Brandt, Charleston K Brandt, David A Brandt, Zackary C Brandt. (McGarry, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Angela Brandt, Charleston K Brandt, Zackary C Brandt, David A Brandt, Alexas N Brandt. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-14382825) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Declaration(s) Certificate of Interested Persons) (McGarry, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
