Kruger v. DeJoy
Vicki Kruger |
Louis DeJoy |
4:2024cv00140 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Terry R Means |
Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with this Court's order of dismissal signed this day in the above-styled and numbered cause, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 3/6/2024) (sre) Modified on 3/6/2024 (sre). |
Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 3/6/2024) (sre) Modified on 3/6/2024 (sre). Modified on 3/6/2024 (sre). |
Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Vicki Kruger must address the following deficiency: The plaintiff has not paid the applicable filing and administrative fees, nor has she filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, and thus has not provided any information about the income, assets, or employment history for her or any spouse.1 In order for the Court to make the determination regarding any pauper application, Plaintiff must provide complete and legible answers to all of the questions in the long-form in-forma-pauperis application.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 2/13/2024) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (sre) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdb) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdb) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Louis DeJoy filed by Vicki Kruger. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kruger v. DeJoy | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vicki Kruger | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Louis DeJoy | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.