Kruger v. DeJoy
Plaintiff: Vicki Kruger
Defendant: Louis DeJoy
Case Number: 4:2024cv00140
Filed: February 9, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Terry R Means
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with this Court's order of dismissal signed this day in the above-styled and numbered cause, and in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 3/6/2024) (sre) Modified on 3/6/2024 (sre).
March 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: This case is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 3/6/2024) (sre) Modified on 3/6/2024 (sre). Modified on 3/6/2024 (sre).
February 13, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Vicki Kruger must address the following deficiency: The plaintiff has not paid the applicable filing and administrative fees, nor has she filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis, and thus has not provided any information about the income, assets, or employment history for her or any spouse.1 In order for the Court to make the determination regarding any pauper application, Plaintiff must provide complete and legible answers to all of the questions in the long-form in-forma-pauperis application.. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 14 days. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 2/13/2024) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (sre)
February 9, 2024 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdb)
February 9, 2024 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdb)
February 9, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Louis DeJoy filed by Vicki Kruger. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kruger v. DeJoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Vicki Kruger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Louis DeJoy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?