Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
Petitioner: Eric Martin Matthews
Respondent: Federal Medical Center Warden and Warden at FMC Fort Worth
Case Number: 4:2024cv00144
Filed: February 13, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed C O'Connor
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Court's #12 order of dismissal entered this day, it is the final judgment of the Court that Eric Martin Matthews's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/5/2024) (saw)
April 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: For these reasons, Matthews's petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2241 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE on jurisdictional grounds. Matthews's motion to conduct discovery is DENIED as moot and unrelated to the claims presented in this action. See Mot., ECF No. #11 . (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/5/2024) (saw)
April 5, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12, 13. Fri Apr 5 13:47:40 CDT 2024 (crt)
April 3, 2024 Filing 11 Motion for Discovery filed by Eric Martin Matthews (saw)
March 18, 2024 Filing 10 Public correspondence received from Eric Martin Matthews with deputy clerk response attached. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page: Clerk's Response) (saw)
March 5, 2024 Filing 9 Document titled "Consent and Election Regarding Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge" filed by Eric Martin Matthews (saw)
February 28, 2024 Filing 8 AMENDED PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Martin Matthews. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (saw)
February 27, 2024 Filing 7 Document titled "Subject Matter Jurisdictional Arguements (18 U.S.C. 3231)" filed by Eric Martin Matthews (saw)
February 27, 2024 Filing 6 Document titled "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 5.1 Notice of A Constitutional Challenge" filed by Eric Martin Matthews (saw) (Main Document 6 replaced on 2/28/2024) (saw).
February 26, 2024 Filing 5 Document titled "Exhibit A" filed by Eric Martin Matthews (saw)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Eric Martin Matthews must address the following deficiency: (1) pay the $5 filing fee; or (2) file an IFP application, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 3/18/2024. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/16/2024) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) IFP With Certificate of Inmate Trust Account.) (saw)
February 16, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Fri Feb 16 15:38:04 CST 2024 (crt)
February 15, 2024 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Thu Feb 15 12:33:44 CST 2024 (crt)
February 13, 2024 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (saw)
February 13, 2024 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (saw)
February 13, 2024 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Eric Martin Matthews. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (saw)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Matthews v. Federal Medical Center Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric Martin Matthews
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Federal Medical Center Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden at FMC Fort Worth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?