Carson v. State of Texas
Michael James Carson |
State of Texas and Director, TDCJ-CID |
4:2024cv00186 |
February 28, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 RESPONSE filed by Michael James Carson re: #14 Order, Terminate Motions. (sre) |
Filing 18 MOTION to Suppress the Hypodermic Syringe, filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
Filing 17 Document titled "Amended Brief" filed by Michael James Carson (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14,15. Wed Apr 10 10:06:07 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Michael James Carson. New address: TDCJ Estelle Unit 264 FM 3478 Huntsville, TX 77320. Copies of documents ECF No. #14 and #15 remailed to Carson at the new address of record. (sre) Modified per SA on 4/10/2024. (sre). |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:15. Tue Apr 2 08:45:49 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 15 ORDER DENYING MOTION REGARDING EXCESS PAGE BRIEF #13 : It is ORDERED that the motion for leave to exceed page limit (ECF No. #13 ) is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 4/1/2024) (sre) |
Filing 14 ORDER RESOLVING PENDING MOTIONS: It is therefore ORDERED that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. #3 ) is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the motion to suppress evidence (ECF No. #4 ), the motion for disclosure of favorable evidence, construed as a motion for discovery (ECF No. #5 ), and the motion to suppress incriminating statements (ECF No. #6 ), are hereby DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the motion to extend time (ECF No. #12 ) is GRANTED, such that the time for Carson to file an amended brief in support that does not exceed 25 pages in length (excluding table of contents and table of authorities), is extended until May 20, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/27/2024) (sre) |
Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limit filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Wed Mar 27 11:15:58 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Deadline Modification per #14 : An amended brief in support that does not exceed 25 pages in length (excluding table of contents and table of authorities), is extended until May 20, 2024. (sre) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Extend Time to file Brief filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8,9. Due to address update, copy of docket numbers 7,8, and 9 re-mailed to petitioner Michael James Carson at most recent address. Tue Mar 19 14:34:41 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 11 Notice of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Michael James Carson. New address: TDCJ Polunsky Unit 3872 FM 350 South Livingston, TX 77351. (saw) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of Address for Pro Se litigant Michael James Carson. New address: TDCJ Byrd Unit 21 FM 247 Huntsville, TX 77320. (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8,9. Remailed per #10 Tue Mar 5 14:20:50 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 9 ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER STRIKING/UNFILING PLEADING: Michael James Carson must address the following deficiency: The memorandum of law (ECF No. #2 ) filed in conjunction with the petition for a writ of habeas corpus exceeds the 25-page length limitation. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 60 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/29/2024) (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Thu Feb 29 11:15:14 CST 2024 (crt) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7,8. Wed Feb 28 11:25:09 CST 2024 (crt) |
Filing 8 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Suppress Incriminating Statements, filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
Filing 5 MOTION for Disclosure of Favorable Evidence, filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Suppress Evidence, filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Michael James Carson. (sre) |
Filing 2 Memorandum in Support filed by Michael James Carson re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (sre) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Michael James Carson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.