Glick v. American Bar Association
Caleb D. Glick |
American Bar Association |
4:2024cv00350 |
April 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Reed C O'Connor |
Hal R Ray |
Contract: Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jnp) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jnp) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by American Bar Association. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14555298) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet Exhibit A, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit(s) C - State Court Docket, #4 Exhibit(s) D - Index of State Court Documents (w. attached pleadings), #5 Exhibit(s) E - Certificate of Interested Persons) (Dodrill, Christopher) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Fri Apr 19 16:33:20 CDT 2024 (crt) |
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by American Bar Association. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (See doc #1 -5 for image.) (jnp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Glick v. American Bar Association | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Caleb D. Glick | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: American Bar Association | |
Represented By: | Christopher S Dodrill |
Represented By: | Charles Robinson Truslow |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.