Sugaal v. Snipes et al
Plaintiff: Hassan Osman Sugaal
Defendant: Christopher Snipes and Antony Blinken
Case Number: 4:2024cv00612
Filed: July 1, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Cureton
Referring Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Immigration: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: The Court hereby REFERS Sugaal's petition and all related filings to United States Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/11/2024) (mmw)
July 10, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ELECTRONIC ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed without Local Counsel. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/10/2024) (chmb)
July 10, 2024 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Antony Blinken ; served on 7/9/2024; Christopher Snipes ; served on 7/9/2024. (Goldstein, Joshua)
July 1, 2024 Filing 6 Summons issued as to Antony Blinken, Christopher Snipes, U.S. Attorney, and U.S. Attorney General. (mmw)
July 1, 2024 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw)
July 1, 2024 Filing 3 Motion for Permission to Proceed without Local Counsel /// Supplemental Document by Hassan Osman Sugaal as to #1 Petition for Writ of Mandamus,, . (Goldstein, Joshua) Modified event and text per PDF on 7/1/2024 (mmw).
July 1, 2024 Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Hassan Osman Sugaal. (Goldstein, Joshua)
July 1, 2024 Filing 1 Petition For Writ of Mandamus filed by Hassan Osman Sugaal. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14731768) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s), #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Certificate of Interested Persons) (Goldstein, Joshua)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sugaal v. Snipes et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Snipes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Antony Blinken
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hassan Osman Sugaal
Represented By: Joshua Laban Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?