Linzy v. Darden Restaurants, Inc.
Carylon Linzy |
Darden Restaurants, Inc. doing business as Longhorn Steakhouse |
ADR Provider |
4:2024cv00780 |
August 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Mark Pittman |
Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 8/11/2025 09:00 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom 4th Floor, 501 W. 10th St. Fort Worth, TX 76102-3673 before Judge Mark Pittman. Joinder of Parties due by 11/15/2024. Amended Pleadings due by 11/15/2024. Deadline for mediation is on or before 2/12/2025. Discovery due by 3/14/2025. Motions due by 4/14/2025. Pretrial Order due by 7/17/2025. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/16/2024) (wxc) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon Sep 16 10:46:37 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 5 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Darden Restaurants, Inc.. (Estes, David) |
Filing 4 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that (1) by August 30, 2024, Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigned's judge-specific requirements and (2) within 14 days after Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint, but no later than September 6, 2024, Defendant(s) file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/16/2024) (sre) |
Filing 3 ORDER: Proposed Scheduling Order due by 9/6/2024. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 8/16/2024) (sre) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3,4. Fri Aug 16 09:06:26 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Darden Restaurants, Inc.. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-14843440) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet Supplement, #3 Exhibit(s) 3 - State Court Docket Sheet, #4 Exhibit(s) 4 - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #5 Exhibit(s) 5 - Citation & Return, #6 Exhibit(s) 6 - Darden's Original Answer, #7 Exhibit(s) 7 - Setting Order, #8 Exhibit(s) 8 - Index, #9 Exhibit(s) 9 - List of Parties & Counsel) (Estes, David) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2. Thu Aug 15 14:49:13 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.