Edmond et al v. Winstead PC Law Firm et al
| Richard Carter, 3rd, Betsy Price, Jimmie Carter, Jr, Grace Edmond, Kelvin Sims, Joyce Murry, Jeffery Sessions, Sr, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin of Russia, Reveren James Murry, Sr., Reverend Charles Hellom, Sr., Asa Hutchinson, Sr., Brad F. Jones and Lakeshia R Edmond |
| Derrick Edmond, Winstead PC Law Firm, 4309 Saddleback Lane Southlake Texas and Bellrock Real Estate Partners |
| 4:2024cv00829 |
| August 30, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER: On October 4, 2023, the Court declared Lakeshia Edmond a vexatious litigant and ordered her to seek leave of court before filing any further complaints in the Northern District of Texas. See ECF No. 29 , Murry v. Serafino, 4:23-CV-0683-P-BJ. In addition, on July 10, 2024, the Court imposed a $250 sanction against Edmond. See ECF No. 7 , Edmond v. EECU, 4:24-CV-00525-O-BP. On August 30, 2024, the clerk of Court docketed this complaint filed by Edmond, which is convoluted and nonsensical. Because Edmond has not paid the $250 sanction, the Court DIRECTS the clerk of Court to STRIKE Edmonds complaint and close this case. If Edmond wants to file a civil action in this Court, she must first pay the $250 sanction and file a proper motion for leave of Court to file a new complaint. Edmonds application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. See ECF No. #4 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/4/2024) (sre)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Sep 4 11:21:59 CDT 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 4309 Saddleback Lane Southlake Texas, Bellrock Real Estate Partners, Derrick Edmond, Winstead PC Law Firm filed by Lakeshia Edmond. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) Modified on 9/3/2024 (sre). |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Lakeshia Edmond. (sre) Modified on 9/3/2024 (sre). |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 2 ***VACATED PER #4 ***New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. (For court use only - links to the #national index and to the prior sanctions found within the #circuit index.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (sre) Modified on 9/4/2024 (sre). |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Fri Aug 30 16:39:39 CDT 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
