Jackson v. Sunrun Installation Services Inc.
| Derek Jackson |
| Sunrun Installation Services Inc. |
| 4:2024cv01145 |
| November 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Torts/Pers Prop: Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #9 Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/10/2024) (chmb)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re #6 Order of Dismissal or Administrative Closure, #7 Judgment, Motion for Reconsideration, Relief from Judgment or Alter or amend Judgment filed by Sunrun Installation Services Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A-Brief in Support, #2 Exhibit(s) Exhibit B-Declaration, #3 Exhibit(s) Exhibit C, #4 Declaration(s) Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit(s) Exhibit E) (Rumac, Michael) |
| Filing 8 Remand Letter mailed to 96th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, Texas with certified copies of #6 Order of Remand, #7 Final Judgment, and public docket sheet. (jnp) |
|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). In accordance with the Court's Order on this same day, this case is REMANDED to the 96th Judicial District Court, Tarrant County, Texas. The Clerk of the Court shall transmit a true copy of this judgment to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/9/2024) (jnp)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: As of the date of this Order, Defendant has failed to obtain local counsel as ordered. Consequently, this case is REMANDED to the 96th Judicial District Court for further proceedings. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/9/2024) (jnp)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Sunrun Installation Services Inc. filed by Derek Jackson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Arnell, Chris) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Lead counsel for each party or designee attorney with appropriate authority and any unrepresented party must confer in an in-person, face-to-face conference as soon as practicable. As a result of the Scheduling Conference, counsel must prepare and submit a Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order by December 20, 2024. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/22/2024) (jnp)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that: (1) by December 6, 2024, Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint and (2) within 14 days after Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint, Defendant(s) file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. The Court further ORDERS that failure of any party to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of Plaintiff(s)'s claims or granting of a default judgment if appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 11/22/2024) (jnp)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jnp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by Sunrun Installation Services Inc. (Filing fee $405; receipt number BTXNDC-15081837) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-E, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Rumac, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Jackson v. Sunrun Installation Services Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Derek Jackson | |
| Represented By: | Chris Arnell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sunrun Installation Services Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Michael S Rumac |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
