Hugues v. Wisch et al
| Terry Hugues |
| Ms. Y Leticia Sanchez Vigil, Joe Crowder, Michael Brown, Sharen Wilson and Scott Wisch |
| 4:2024cv01215 |
| December 9, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Mon Jan 27 09:39:12 CST 2025 (crt) |
Filing 8
ORDER: The Court concludes that dismissal of this action is warranted. Hugues's complaint is, therefore, DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). His application to proceed in forma pauperis is also DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as moot. See ECF No. #3 . (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/24/2025) (sre)
|
|
Filing 7
FINAL JUDGMENT: In accordance with the Courts order of dismissal entered this day and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, it is the final judgment of the Court that Plaintiffs complaint is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See FED. R. CIV. P. 58. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/24/2025) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Fri Jan 24 16:36:29 CST 2025 (crt) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: If Hugues intends to proceed with this action, he must do the following within 30 days: (1) either pay the $405 filing fee or file a certificate of inmate trust account; and (2) file an amended complaint on the proper form. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Hugues's 2 cursory request for the Court to appoint him counsel is DENIED without prejudice as premature. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/13/2024) (jnp)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Dec 13 09:35:14 CST 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Tue Dec 10 16:41:49 CST 2024 (crt) |
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jnp) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jnp) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Terry Hughes (jnp) |
| Filing 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel and Motion of Discovery Evidence filed by Terry Hughes (See doc. #1 for image.) (jnp) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Brown, Joe Crowder, Y Leticia Sanchez Vigil, Sharen Wilson, Scott Wisch filed by Terry Hughes. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jnp) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
