Thompson v. The State of Texas et al et al
| Demetrius Lamar Thompson |
| Marisela Rodriguez, Michael Tipsord doing business as State Farm CEO, Pamela Schoch doing business as Attorney of Records, State Farm Auto Insurance, Robert Isom doing business as American Airlines CEO, Lincy Thomas SBN 24065288 doing business as State Attorney, The State of Texas et al, Jay Johnson SBN 24085749 doing business as State Attorney, Derrick Woods SBN 24113467 doing business as State Attorney, TWU Local 513, Dallas County, Karen E. Young doing business as State Attorney, Warren Kenneth Paxton, Jr doing business as Attorney General of the State of Texas, Marianna Ashley Walls, Lindsey Lacy SBN 24075606 doing business as State Attorney, Mary C. Brown doing business as District Court Judge, American Airlines Group (Inc.), Gabrielle R. George SBN 24098879 doing business as State Attorney, Office of Attorney General State of Texas, Felicia Pitre doing business as District Clerk, Maya Lynnette Harris Evans doing business as District Court Judge and Governor Greg Abbott doing business as Governor of the State of Texas |
| 4:2024cv01271 |
| December 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed C O'Connor |
| Hal R Ray |
| Civil Rights: Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS: Plaintiff's #3 amended application to proceed IFP is GRANTED. Plaintiff may proceed in this action without paying the $405 filing and administrative fees. Plaintiff's #2 original IFP application is DENIED as moot. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 12/31/2024) (mmw)
|
| Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. (mmw) |
| Filing 3 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Demetrius Lamar Thompson (mmw) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Demetrius Lamar Thompson (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Demetrius Lamar Thompson. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Tue Dec 31 14:11:01 CST 2024 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Tue Dec 31 15:54:54 CST 2024 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
