Weeks v. NewRez LLC
| James Shane Weeks |
| NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing |
| NewRez LLC doing business as Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing |
| James Shane Weeks |
| 4:2025cv00515 |
| May 15, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 27, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
FINAL JUDGMENT: This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). In accordance with the Court's #7 Order on this same day, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/27/2025) (jnp)
|
Filing 7
ORDER: It is ORDERED that this case is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court's #3 Order. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/27/2025) (jnp)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Christopher Austin John on behalf of NewRez LLC. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (John, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by NewRez LLC. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Manning, Matt) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Lead counsel for each party or designee attorney with appropriate authority and any unrepresented party must confer in an in-person, face-to-face conference as soon as practicable. As a result of the Scheduling Conference, counsel must prepare and submit a Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order by May 29, 2025. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/16/2025) (jnp)
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court ORDERS that by May 23, 2025, Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint and within 14 days after Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint, Defendant(s) file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. The Court further ORDERS that failure of any party to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including dismissal of Plaintiff(s)'s claims or granting of a default judgment if appropriate. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 5/16/2025) (jnp)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jnp) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Newrez LLC d/b/a Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-15505921) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A, #2 Exhibit(s) B, #3 Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Manning, Matt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.