Davis v. Peterson
Plaintiff: Joyce Davis
Defendant: David Peterson and Sylvania LNU 4:25-cv-521-P
Case Number: 4:2025cv00521
Filed: May 16, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Contract: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 24 FINAL JUDGMENT: This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/28/2025) (mmw)
October 28, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER ACCEPTING #18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court therefore ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/28/2025) (mmw)
October 28, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:23, 24. Tue Oct 28 16:05:34 CDT 2025 (crt)
October 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER: Before the Court is the #21 Motion for Continuance. The motion is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/7/2025) (mmw)
October 7, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:22. Tue Oct 7 09:28:53 CDT 2025 (crt)
October 6, 2025 Filing 21 MOTION for Continuance filed by Joyce Davis (mmw)
October 2, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER: Before the Court is the #19 Motion for Extension of Time. The motion is hereby DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/2/2025) (mmw)
October 2, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:20. Thu Oct 2 08:24:58 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 25, 2025 Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Joyce Davis (mmw)
September 16, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 18 FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The Court RECOMMENDS that this case be DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. It is hereby ORDERED that each party is granted until October 6, 2025,2 to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judges proposed findings, conclusions, and recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 9/16/2025) (mmw)
September 16, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:18. Tue Sep 16 14:08:39 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 4, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SECOND ORDER REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULES: Local Civil Rules 5.1(e) & (f) require the parties in a case to register an email address and register as an electronic case (ECF) filer. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 9/25/2025. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 9/4/2025) (mmw)
September 4, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:17. Thu Sep 4 15:22:42 CDT 2025 (crt)
August 22, 2025 Filing 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Peterson, Sylvania LNU 4:25-cv-521-P filed by Joyce Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw)
August 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE SECOND FORM AMENDED COMPLAINT: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff shall, no later than August 22, 2025, file a fully completed second amended complaint form with any attachment pages in accordance with the terms in this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 8/7/2025) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (mmw)
August 7, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:15. Thu Aug 7 16:54:55 CDT 2025 (crt)
July 25, 2025 Filing 14 Public correspondence addressed to Magistrate Judge Cureton filed by Joyce Davis (jnp)
July 25, 2025 Filing 13 RESPONSE filed by Joyce Davis re: #12 Order Granting Plaintiff's #10 Motion for Extension of Time (jnp)
July 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S #10 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: It is ORDERED that Davis' Motion for Extension of Time be GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Davis shall, no later than July 25, 2025, comply with the local rules of file a motion for exemption from the ECF requirements. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 7/7/2025) (mmw)
July 7, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:12. Mon Jul 7 09:49:13 CDT 2025 (crt)
July 1, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: After the Magistrate Judge entered the FCR, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint. ECF No. #9 . The Court therefore finds the FCR moot and declines to rule on it. The case is returned to the Magistrate Judge to consider Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 7/1/2025) (mmw)
July 1, 2025 Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Joyce Davis (mmw)
July 1, 2025 Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT against David Peterson filed by Joyce Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw)
July 1, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11. Tue Jul 1 16:37:17 CDT 2025 (crt)
June 18, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER RECOMMENDING DISMISSALAND RETURNING CASE TO DISTRICT JUDGE: The Court RECOMMENDS that the above - styled and numbered case be DISMISSED for failing to comply with the Court's order. It is hereby ORDERED that each party is granted until July 2, 2025, to serve and file written objections to the United States Magistrate Judge's proposed findings, conclusions and recommendation. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 6/18/2025) (mmw)
June 18, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Jun 18 14:23:52 CDT 2025 (crt)
May 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A FORM AMENDED COMPLAINT AND COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES: It is ORDERED that Plaintiff, no later than June 6, 2025, shall file a fully completed amended complaint form with any attachment pages in accordance with the terms of this Order. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/19/2025) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (mmw)
May 19, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER : Plaintiff's #2 IFP application is GRANTED. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton on 5/19/2025) (mmw)
May 19, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. Mon May 19 14:22:22 CDT 2025 (crt)
May 19, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Mon May 19 13:56:17 CDT 2025 (crt)
May 16, 2025 Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw)
May 16, 2025 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Cureton preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Appropriate Staff Attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Jeffrey L. Cureton. (mmw)
May 16, 2025 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joyce Davis. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (mmw)
May 16, 2025 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Joyce Davis (mmw)
May 16, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Peterson filed by Joyce Davis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (mmw)
May 16, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4, 5. Fri May 16 14:43:10 CDT 2025 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Davis v. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joyce Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sylvania LNU 4:25-cv-521-P
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?