Harris v. Equifax Information Services, LLC.
| Charles Eric Harris |
| Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 4:2025cv00807 |
| July 29, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed O'Connor |
| Hal R Ray |
| Other Statutes: Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 20
ORDER: The parties are therefore ORDERED to file the appropriate dismissal papers a stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or an agreed motion with corresponding proposed order with the Clerk's Office by February 13, 2026. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 12/16/2025) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:20. Tue Dec 16 10:04:40 CST 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Settlement filed by Equifax Information Services LLC (Seger, Forrest) |
Filing 18
ORDER: Equifax shall file an answer or otherwise respond to the complaint on or before December 15, 2025. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 12/8/2025) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:18. Mon Dec 8 15:49:15 CST 2025 (crt) |
Filing 17
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: The undersigned District Judge believes that the #16 Findings and Conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct, and they are accepted as the Findings and Conclusions of the Court. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendant Equifax's Motion to Set Aside Default (ECF No. #10 ) and DENIES Harris' "Motion for Entry of Default" (ECF No. #13 ) as moot. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 11/18/2025) (saw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:17. Tue Nov 18 09:23:18 CST 2025 (crt) |
Filing 16
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Because Equifax has shown good cause under Rule 55(c) to set aside the default, and Plaintiff does not oppose its motion, the undersigned RECOMMENDS that Chief Judge OConnor GRANT Equifax's unopposed Motion to Set Aside the Default (ECF No. #10 ) and DENY as moot Harris' Motion for Entry of Default (ECF No #13 ). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 10/30/2025) (sre)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:16. Thu Oct 30 09:54:16 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 15 Supplemental Document by Equifax Information Services, LLC. as to #10 MOTION to Set Aside #8 Clerk's Entry of Default . (Seger, Forrest) |
Filing 14
ORDER: It is therefore ORDERED that Equifax shall file a supplement to the Motion with the required certificate of conference on or before October 31, 2025. Failure to comply with this Order may result in an order recommending Equifax's Motion be denied. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 10/24/2025) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:14. Fri Oct 24 12:08:44 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 13 Request for Clerk to issue Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Charles Eric Harris. (Clerk declines to enter default - pending motion #10 and Clerk's entry of default as to Equifax Information Services, LLC entered as #8 ) (wxc) Modified docket text on 10/17/2025 (wxc). |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Equifax Information Services, LLC.. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Seger, Forrest) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Emma Connolly Jenevein on behalf of Equifax Information Services, LLC.. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Jenevein, Emma) |
| Filing 10 MOTION to Set Aside #8 Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Equifax Information Services, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) 1, #2 Proposed Order)Attorney Forrest Mathew Seger, III added to party Equifax Information Services, LLC.(pty:dft) (Seger, Forrest) |
Filing 9
ORDER: the Court DIRECTS Plaintiff to move for entry of default judgment against Defendant (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 55) on or before October 18, 2025. Otherwise, the undersigned may recommend that Chief United States District Judge Reed OConnor dismiss Plaintiffs claims without prejudice for want of prosecution. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 10/10/2025) (wxc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:9. Fri Oct 10 10:37:11 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 8 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (wxc) |
| Filing 7 Plaintiff's Motion for Clerk's Entry of Default filed by Charles Eric Harris (wxc) |
| Filing 6 Summons Returned Executed as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. ; served on 8/18/2025. (wxc) |
Filing 5
ORDER: Because he has paid the filing fee, the plaintiff is now responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 7/31/2025) (Attachments: #1 Rule 4) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Thu Jul 31 09:59:32 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (saw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2, 3. Wed Jul 30 11:25:58 CDT 2025 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Equifax Information Services, LLC. (saw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Ray preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (saw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Equifax Information Services, LLC. filed by Charles Eric Harris. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number 400004880) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (saw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Harris v. Equifax Information Services, LLC. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Charles Eric Harris | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Equifax Information Services LLC | |
| Represented By: | Emma Connolly Jenevein |
| Represented By: | Forrest Mathew Seger, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.