Fuller v. Guinn Justice Center
Plaintiff: Joseph Dan Fuller
Defendant: Guinn Justice Center
Case Number: 4:2025cv00951
Filed: September 2, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 28, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 28, 2025 Filing 13 Certificate of Trust Account by Joseph Dan Fuller TDCJ # 01199377. (mmw)
October 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 12 FINAL JUDGMENT: Consistent with the order of dismissal signed this date, the claims of Plaintiff, Joseph Dan Fuller, are DISMISSED for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/21/2025) (mmw)
October 21, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Plaintiff's claims in this action are DISMISSED for want of prosecution. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 10/21/2025) (mmw)
October 21, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:11, 12. Tue Oct 21 10:15:24 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 24, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: Before the Court is the #9 motion of Plaintiff, Joseph Dan Fuller, for reconsideration of the order denying appointment of counsel. The motion is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/24/2025) (mmw)
September 24, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:10. Wed Sep 24 10:04:03 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 23, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION for Reconsideration re ( #8 in 4:25-cv-00952-O) Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, ( #8 in 4:25-cv-00951-P) Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Joseph Dan Fuller (mmw)
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: Before the Court is the #2 motion of Plaintiff, Joseph Dan Fuller, for appointment of counsel. The motion is DENIED. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/5/2025) (mmw)
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER TO REPLEAD: Plaintiff must complete and return the forms by October 6, 2025, to proceed with this action. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/5/2025) (Attachments: #1 Amended Complaint) (mmw)
September 5, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Court GRANTS his #3 IFP application. Order For Partial Filing Fee in amount of $5.22 with a balance of $344.78 remaining. (Clerk note: TDCJ Inmate Trust Office has been electronically notified of this order. TDCJ #: 02498269) (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 9/5/2025) (mmw)
September 5, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8. Fri Sep 5 10:55:44 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 5, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7, 8. Fri Sep 5 11:11:37 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 5, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6. Fri Sep 5 09:08:05 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 4, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4,5. Thu Sep 4 12:32:55 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 2, 2025 Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc)
September 2, 2025 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. All counsel and unrepresented parties are also reminded of the judge-specific requirement that they read and abide by (1) Dondi Properties Corp. v. Commerce Savings & Loan Assoc., 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988);(2) the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas;(3) the Texas Lawyers Creed;(4) the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct;and (5) Judge-Specific Requirements of Judge Pittman. (wxc)
September 2, 2025 Filing 3 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Joseph Dan Fuller (wxc)
September 2, 2025 Filing 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel filed by Joseph Dan Fuller (wxc)
September 2, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Guinn Justice Center filed by Joseph Dan Fuller. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fuller v. Guinn Justice Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph Dan Fuller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Guinn Justice Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?