Sorrow v. King & George LLC
Plaintiff: Jason Edward Sorrow
Defendant: King & George LLC
Case Number: 4:2025cv01036
Filed: September 24, 2025
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Reed O'Connor
Referring Judge: Hal R Ray
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2025 Filing 13 REPLY filed by King & George LLC re: #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Parker, Talley)
October 27, 2025 Filing 12 RESPONSE filed by Jason Edward Sorrow re: #11 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing, #7 Partial Motion to Dismiss (Sorrow, Jason) Modified document linkage to #7 on 11/14/2025 (jnp).
October 17, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: Before the Court are Defendant King & George LLC's #7 12(b)(6) Partial Motion to Dismiss and #8 Brief in Support filed on October 16, 2025. Plaintiff Jason Sorrow SHALL file his response to the Motion on or before November 6, 2025. Also by that date, Sorrow SHALL file a brief that complies with the Local Civil Rules of the Northern District of Texas. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 10/17/2025) (jnp)
October 16, 2025 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by King & George LLC. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entry indicated). (Parker, Talley) Modified Clerk QC note on 10/17/2025 (jnp).
October 16, 2025 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,, filed by King & George LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (Parker, Talley)
October 16, 2025 Filing 8 Brief/Memorandum in Support filed by King & George LLC re #7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (Parker, Talley)
October 16, 2025 Filing 7 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by King & George LLC (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)Attorney Talley Ray Parker added to party King & George LLC(pty:dft) (Parker, Talley)
October 3, 2025 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to All Defendants. (Clerk's note: King & George LLC served on 9/25/2025.) (Sorrow, Jason) Modified to add Clerk's note on 10/6/2025 (jnp).
September 26, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Because he paid the filing fee, the plaintiff is now responsible for serving the defendant with a summons and a copy of the complaint in this case as provided by Rule 4(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr on 9/26/2025) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Rule 4) (jnp)
September 26, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Fri Sep 26 15:46:07 CDT 2025 (crt)
September 24, 2025 Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jnp)
September 24, 2025 Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set (see Special Order 3). Magistrate Judge Hal R. Ray, Jr. preliminarily assigned. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jnp)
September 24, 2025 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to King & George LLC. (Clerk's note: Issued summons provided to Plaintiff OTC in the Clerk's Office on 9/24/2025.) (jnp)
September 24, 2025 Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against King & George LLC filed by Jason Edward Sorrow. (Filing fee $405.00; Receipt number 400005121) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (jnp)
September 24, 2025 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:3, 4. Wed Sep 24 12:24:59 CDT 2025 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sorrow v. King & George LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Edward Sorrow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: King & George LLC
Represented By: Kshitizraj Sharma Gautam
Represented By: Talley Ray Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?