Mosser v. American Precision Ammunition LLC
| James C. Mosser |
| American Precision Ammunition LLC |
| Kotak Mahindra Bank LTD and Hughes Precision Ammunition Manufacturing PVT |
| American Precision Ammunition LLC |
| 4:2025cv01396 |
| December 10, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| Application for a Writ of Garnishment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 17
ORDER: Before the Court is the Receiver's request for an order authorizingsubstitute service on Garnishee, by certified mail. The Court GRANTS the #16 Motion and DIRECTS service of the writ of garnishment to be served on Kotak Mahindra Bank LTD by serving Kotak Mahindra's New York Branch, via certified mail at 1 PENNSYLVANIA PLAZA, SUITE 1720, NEW YORK, NY 10119. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/18/2026) (jnp)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION Substituted Service filed by James C. Mosser (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Mosser, Nicholas) |
| Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Unexecuted as to Kotak Mahindra Bank LTD. (jnp) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER: Before the Court is the Receiver's #13 request for an order authorizing the United States Marshals Service to execute and enforce the writ of garnishment previously issued in this action. Having considered the writ the Court finds that good cause exists to GRANT the requested relief. The United States Marshals Service in the Northern District of Texas SHALL deliver the Writ of Garnishment to the appropriate United States' Marshall in New York who is then DIRECTED to execute and enforce the writ of garnishment issued in this matter and to take all actions reasonably necessary to effectuate the garnishment described therein. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/20/2026) (jnp)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION Direct US Marshalls to serve Writ re #8 Writ Issued filed by James C. Mosser (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Mosser, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER: Before the Court is Plaintiff James C. Mosser's #9 Motion to Retain. Having considered the Motion and the relevant law, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/5/2026) (mmw)
|
| Filing 11 Writ of Garnishment Issued as to Hughes Precision Ammunition Manufacturing PVT. (jnp) |
| Filing 10 Request for Clerk to issue Writ of Garnishment filed by James C. Mosser. (Mosser, Nicholas) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to Reopen Case Motion to Retain filed by James C. Mosser with Brief/Memorandum in Support. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Mosser, Nicholas) |
| Filing 8 Writ of Garnishment Issued as to Kotak Mahindra Bank LTD. (saw) |
| Filing 7 Request for Clerk to issue Writ of Garnishment filed by James C. Mosser. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Writ for Hughes) (Mosser, Nicholas) |
| Filing 6 Writ of Garnishment Issued as to Kotak Mahindra Bank LTD, Hughes Precision Ammunition Manufacturing PVT (per DJ Chambers). (jnp) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Mark Pittman: Status Conference held on 12/29/2025. Attorney Appearances: Plaintiff - Nicholas Mosser, James Mosser, Jacob Barfield; Judgment Creditor Attorney - Paul Downy (Court Reporter: Monica Guzman) (No exhibits) Time in Court - :06. (chmb) |
| Filing 4 RESPONSE filed by James C. Mosser re: #3 Order Setting Deadline/Hearing (Mosser, Nicholas) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: The Court ORDERS all counsel of record to appear at a hearing to be held December 29, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. in the Fourth Floor Courtroom of the Eldon B. Mahon United States Courthouse. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 12/22/2025) (jnp)
|
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. All counsel and unrepresented parties are also reminded of the judge-specific requirement that they read and abide by (1) Dondi Properties Corp. v. Commerce Savings & Loan Assoc., 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988);(2) the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas;(3) the Texas Lawyers Creed;(4) the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct;and (5) Judge-Specific Requirements of Judge Pittman. (jnp) |
| Filing 1 APPLICATION for Writ of Garnishment filed by James C Mosser. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-16046546) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit(s) Affidavit in Support of garnishemnt, #2 Exhibit(s) ex a, #3 Exhibit(s) ex b, #4 Exhibit(s) ex c) (Mosser, Nicholas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
