NOBRIGA et al v. CERMS, LLC
| TIFFANY GRAY, ALYSSA NOBRIGA, GALLIENNE NABILA, IRINA VORONINA, MARIANA DAVALOS, SANDRA VALENCIA and TIFFANY TOTH |
| CERMS, LLC doing business as EL PARIAN NIGHT CLUB |
| 4:2025cv01443 |
| December 22, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER: This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). In accordance with the Court's #5 Order on this same day, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall transmit a true copy of this judgment to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/12/2026) (saw)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: A review of the record reveals that Plaintiffs failed to comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) despite the Court's #2 notice that this could result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. The Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice per Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/12/2026) (saw)
|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to CERMS, LLC ; served on 1/7/2025. (Casas, Joseph) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to CERMS, LLC. (saw) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. All counsel and unrepresented parties are also reminded of the judge-specific requirement that they read and abide by (1) Dondi Properties Corp. v. Commerce Savings & Loan Assoc., 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988);(2) the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas;(3) the Texas Lawyers Creed;(4) the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct;and (5) Judge-Specific Requirements of Judge Pittman. (saw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against CERMS, LLC filed by TIFFANY GRAY, ALYSSA NOBRIGA, MARIANA DAVALOS, IRINA VORONINA, GALLIENNE NABILA, SANDRA VALENCIA. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-16075614) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) A-F, #2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Exhibit(s) Request for Issuance of Summons) (Casas, Joseph) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
