Bownes v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
Plaintiff: PATRICIA BOWNES
Defendant: KRGP Inc. and Kroger Texas, L.P.
Case Number: 4:2026cv00023
Filed: January 8, 2026
Court: U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Mark Pittman
Nature of Suit: Torts/Pers Inj: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 10 FINAL JUDGMENT: This final judgment is issued pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(a). In accordance with the Court's #9 Order on this same day, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the Court shall transmit a true copy of this judgment to the parties. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/2/2026) (saw)
March 2, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Acting upon the Parties' representations that this case has been settled, the Court ORDERS that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 3/2/2026) (saw)
January 27, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER: The Court received notification that the Parties settled in the instant dispute. ECF No. #7 . The Court therefore ORDERS that all deadlines are STAYED until further ordered by the Court. The Parties shall file appropriate dismissal papers-either a stipulation of dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) or an appropriate motion and corresponding proposed order-with the Clerk's Office on or before February 27, 2026. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/27/2026) (saw)
January 27, 2026 Filing 7 NOTICE of SETTLEMENT filed by Kroger Texas, L.P. (Panuthos, Thomas)
January 21, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: The Court ORDERS that by January 27, 2026, Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint that complies with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, and the undersigned's judge-specific requirements and within 14 days after Plaintiff(s) file an amended complaint, Defendant(s) file an answer or other response to the amended complaint. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/21/2026) (jnp)
January 13, 2026 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: As a result of the Scheduling Conference, counsel must prepare and submit a Report Regarding Contents of Scheduling Order ("Joint Report") by January 27, 2026. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 1/13/2026) (saw)
January 9, 2026 Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge Pittman. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. All counsel and unrepresented parties are also reminded of the judge-specific requirement that they read and abide by (1) Dondi Properties Corp. v. Commerce Savings & Loan Assoc., 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988);(2) the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas;(3) the Texas Lawyers Creed;(4) the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct;and (5) Judge-Specific Requirements of Judge Pittman. (saw)
January 8, 2026 Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by KROGER TEXAS, L.P.. (Clerk QC note: Affiliate entered in ECF). (Panuthos, Thomas) Modified affiliates on 1/9/2026 (saw).
January 8, 2026 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND filed by KROGER TEXAS, L.P.. (Filer fee note- Filed by the USA) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Index of Attachments, #2 Exhibit(s) 1-11, #3 Cover Sheet, #4 Cover Sheet Supplement) (Panuthos, Thomas)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bownes v. Kroger Texas, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PATRICIA BOWNES
Represented By: Angel Guillermo Medina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: KRGP Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Panuthos
Represented By: B Kyle Briscoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kroger Texas, L.P.
Represented By: Thomas Andrew Panuthos
Represented By: B Kyle Briscoe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?