Medina v. Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC et al
| Anna Medina |
| Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC and Michael Ruff |
| 4:2026cv00151 |
| February 12, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed O'Connor |
| Labor: Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 27, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: The Joint Report shall be filed on or before April 24, 2026. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 3/27/2026) (mmw)
|
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Michael Ruff, Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Hartmann, Clay) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,,, filed by Michael Ruff, Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice.Attorney Clay A Hartmann added to party Michael Ruff(pty:dft), Attorney Clay A Hartmann added to party Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC(pty:dft) (Hartmann, Clay) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Michael Ruff, Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s)) (mmw) |
| Filing 5 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. File to: Judge O Connor. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (mmw) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to issue Summons Michael Ruff filed by Anna Medina. (Vaught, Allen) |
| Filing 3 Request for Clerk to issue Summons Ruff's Dog Ranch, LLC filed by Anna Medina. (Vaught, Allen) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Anna Medina. (Clerk QC note: No affiliate entered in ECF). (Vaught, Allen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Anna Medina. (Filing fee $405; Receipt number ATXNDC-16191983) Plaintiff will submit summons(es) for issuance. In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (Vaught, Allen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
