Everetts v. County Criminal Court No 8 et al
| Sherita Everetts |
| County Criminal Court No 8, Charles Chuck Vanover, Christy Young, Marissa Mattews and PCS Bail Bonds |
| 4:2026cv00356 |
| March 18, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Reed O'Connor |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Mandamus & Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 4, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Amended MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sherita Everetts (jnp) |
Filing 11
ORDER: After review, the Court DENIES the #10 application without prejudice to Plaintiff's right to file a long-form IFP application in accordance with the Court's April 2 order by May 4. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 4/15/2026) (jnp)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Sherita Everetts (jnp) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Sherita Everetts must address the following deficiency: Everetts has not paid the $405 filing and administrative fees for this action or filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. Everetts's cursory #4 motion to be excused from the requirement of electronic filing is DENIED without prejudice to her right to reurge it. (Ordered by Chief District Judge Reed O'Connor on 4/2/2026) (Attachments: #1 IFP) (jnp) Modified docket text on 4/7/2026 (jnp).
|
| Filing 8 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (jnp) |
| Filing 7 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (jnp) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC ORDER transferring case to the Fort Worth Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Under the authority of Miscellaneous Order No. 6, this action is transferred to the Fort Worth Division, where venue is proper. See 28 U.S.C. 1404(a). Plaintiff filed this pro se civil action alleging claims arising from a Tarrant County criminal action and suing Defendants in Tarrant County. Plaintiff's complaint alleges no events that occurred within the Dallas Division. Doc. 3. (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/24/2026) (chmb)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC NOTICE OF JUDICIAL SCREENING AND STANDING ORDER. Judicial screening of this case is pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). It is therefore ORDERED that (1) service of process shall be withheld pending completion of judicial screening, (2) no motions for appointment of counsel shall be filed until the Court has completed the screening process, (3) all discovery in this case is stayed until the Court enters a scheduling order, (4) no amendments or supplements to the complaint shall be filed without prior Court approval, and (5) any motion to amend the complaint must be accompanied by a complete proposed amended complaint on the required form. It is further ORDERED that Plaintiff must promptly notify the Court in writing of any change of address by filing a written Notice of Change of Address with the Clerk of the Court. Failure to provide updated address information may result in the dismissal of the case for failure to prosecute or follow court order under Fed. R. Civ. 41(b). (Ordered by Magistrate Judge Renee Harris Toliver on 3/24/2026) (chmb)
|
| NEW CASE NUMBER 4:26-cv-00356-O Everetts v. Vanover et al has been opened following the order of transfer entered in case number 3:26cv0871-E. Future filings should reflect only the new case number and be directed to the proper division (see LR 5.1(a)). Clerk to complete new case processing and mail notice of this entry to any party who did not receive it electronically. (ldm) |
| Filing 4 MOTION to Opt out of ECF Notifications filed by Sherita Everetts. (ndt) |
| Filing 3 COMPLAINT against Marissa Mattews, PCS Bail Bonds, Charles Vanover, Christy Young filed by Sherita Everetts. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (ndt) |
| Filing 2 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (ndt) |
| Filing 1 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Toliver (see Special Order 3). Case received over counter or electronically. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge (Judge Toliver). Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (ndt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
