Fair v. Luke Motor Company II, LLC
| Leilani M Fair |
| Luke Motor Company II, LLC doing business as Vandergriff Honda |
| 4:2026cv00652 |
| May 27, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Terry R Means |
| Contract: Other Contract |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of request for status of pending screening under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) re: #8 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, #1 Complaint,, filed by Leilani M Fair (Fair, Leilani) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Election of Remedies Federal Fair v Vandergriff re: #1 Complaint filed by Leilani M Fair (Fair, Leilani) |
Filing 8
ORDER GRANTING #3 APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS : Service of process will be withheld pending judicial screening of Plaintiff's complaint. (Ordered by Senior Judge Terry R Means on 5/29/2026) (mmw)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri May 29 15:27:07 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 7 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (mmw) |
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (mmw) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6, 7. Thu May 28 08:44:08 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 5 (Document Restricted) SEALED unredacted duplicates of #1 #2 #3 #4 filed by Leilani Fair(Notice: Any required service of this document is the responsibility of the filer.) (mmw) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Filing Exhibits filed by Leilani Fair (mmw) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Leilani Fair (mmw) |
| Filing 2 Request for Clerk to issue Summons filed by Leilani Fair. (Not issued secondary to pending IFP) (mmw) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against Luke Motor Company II, LLC filed by Leilani Fair. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet) (mmw) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Fair v. Luke Motor Company II, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Leilani M Fair | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Luke Motor Company II, LLC doing business as Vandergriff Honda | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
