Goebel v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
| John Edward Goebel |
| Federal Bureau of Prisons, William D. Marshall, General Counsel, C. Colbert, K. Heckard, E. Vera and E. James |
| 4:2026cv00708 |
| June 9, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: John Edward Goebel must address the following deficiency: Plaintiff has not paid the applicable filing fee or filed a proper motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 7/10/2026. (Ordered by Judge Mark Pittman on 6/11/2026) (Attachments: #1 IFP Form) (hcc)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Jun 11 09:43:56 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Wed Jun 10 13:38:54 CDT 2026 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (wxc) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. All counsel and unrepresented parties are also reminded of the judge-specific requirement that they read and abide by (1) Dondi Properties Corp. v. Commerce Savings & Loan Assoc., 121 F.R.D. 284 (N.D. Tex. 1988);(2) the Local Civil Rules of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas;(3) the Texas Lawyers Creed;(4) the Texas Disciplinary Rules of Professional Conduct;and (5) Judge-Specific Requirements of Judge Pittman. (wxc) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by John Edward Goebel. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (wxc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.