Childrens Lighthouse Franchise Company v. CLKS 2, LLC et al
| Childrens Lighthouse Franchise Company |
| CLKS 2, LLLC, Aspen Vaughn and Sheryl Vaughn |
| 4:2026cv00721 |
| June 11, 2026 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Mark Pittman |
| Contract: Franchise |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 11, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL filed by Aspen Vaughn. (Filing fee $405; receipt number ATXNDC-16527100) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Sheet, #3 Index of Documents from State Court, #4 Index of Documents from State Court, #5 Sheryl Vaughn's Consent to Revoval, #6 Certificate of Interested Persons) (Lidia, Chaz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
