Dean v. Prieto et al
| Marcell Deon Dean |
| Eric Pena, Thomas Stevens and Jason Prieto |
| 5:2011cv00013 |
| January 14, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Lubbock Office |
| Lubbock |
| Nancy M Koenig |
| Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
Order Adopting Report and Recommendations, ORDER DISMISSING CASE AS FRIVOLOUS. The undersigned United States District Judge has made an independent examination of the record in this case and has examined the findings, conclusions, and recommendatio ns of the Magistrate Judge. The Court accepts and adopts the findings, conclusions, and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE AS FRIVOLOUS. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. The dismissal shall count as a qualifying dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g) and Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Dismissal of this action does not release Plaintiff or the instit ution where he is incarcerated from the obligation to pay any filing fee previously imposed. Any pending motions are DENIED. re: 26 Findings and Recommendations on re: 1 Complaint, filed by Marcell Deon Dean. (Ordered by Judge Sam R Cummings on 9/26/2013) (lkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
