Ybarra v. Lubbock Police Dept #1 Officer et al
Adolfo Ybarra, Jr |
Lubbock Police Dept #1 Officer and Lubbock Police Dept Officer # 2 |
5:2014cv00164 |
September 29, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Lubbock Office |
Hale |
Sam R Cummings |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 Order Accepting and Adopting 46 Report and Recommendation on re: 1 Complaint filed by Adolfo Ybarra, Jr. Before entering a scheduling order in this case, the court will first determine whether Defendants are entitled to the defense of quali fied immunity. It is ordered that within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order, Defendants Justin Criner and Joel Goolsby will file a motion for summary judgment relating to the issue of qualified immunity. Plaintiff's reply, if any, shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date shown on Defendants' certificate of service. It is further ordered that any discovery pertaining to claims against Defendants Justin Criner and Joel Goolsby, not related to the issue of qual ified immunity, is STAYED until the issue of qualified immunity has been decided by the Court, at which time the stay will be automatically lifted without further order. It is further ordered that the style of the instant case shall henceforth be changed to Adolfo Ybarra, Jr. v. Justin Criner, et al. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/6/2017) (bdg) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.