Welsh v. Correct Care Recovery Solutions et al
| Lonnie Kade Welsh |
| Correct Care Recovery Solutions, Bryan Thomas, Chris Woods, Amy Goldstein, Edward Towns, Bill Vanier, Jane Salazar, Margarito Gonzales, Jacob Richard, NFN Flores, Robbie Spencer, Dustin Tijerina, Kevin Tedder, Arnulfo Hernandez, Jr., Leslie Dinwiddie, Mary Leeks, Maria Sanchez, Jorge Juarez, JOHN DOE, JANE DOE, Lisa Peralta, Daniel Rake, NFN Kasting, Rosss Hester, NFN Rodriguez, Albert Garcia, The City of Littlefield Police Department, Lamb County Presecutors Office, 154th District Court of Lamb County, 154th District Attorney's Office, Lamb County Attorney's Office, NFN Russal, Jacob Richardson, Leslie Dimwiddie, City of Littlefield, Leon Ponce, Ross Hester, NFN Mann and Scott Say |
| 5:2018cv00020 |
| January 23, 2018 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Lubbock Office |
| Lubbock |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Conditions of Confinement |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
273
ORDER re: 268 Findings and Recommendations on re: 20 Amended Complaint filed by Lonnie Kade Welsh. After due consideration and having conducted a de nova review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections should be OVERRULED. It is the refore ORDERED that the findings and conclusions contained in the Report and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. The Court ORDERS that summary judgment is denied as to Plaintiff's claims: (1) asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force against Defendants Vanier and Dinwiddie; and (2) for state law assault asserted against Defendants Vanier and Hernandez. The Court further ORDERS that summary judgment is granted as to Plaintiff's claims: (1) asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for excessive force against Defendants Gonzales and Hernandez and said claims are DISMISSED; (2) asserted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for bystander liability against Defendant Gonzales and said claim i s DISMISSED; (3) for state law assaultasserted against Defendant Gonzales and said claim is DISMISSED; (4) for state law intentional infliction of emotional distress asserted against Defendants Vanier, Gonzales, and Hernandez and said claims are DISM ISSED; (5) for state law false arrest asserted against Defendant Vanier and said claim is DISMISSED; and (6) for state law negligence asserted against Defendant Vanier and said claim is DISMISSED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 1/17/2024) (bmh)
|
|
Filing
200
ORDER: After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Petitioner's objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has further conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclus ions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the findings and conclusions contained in the Report and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that: ( 1) Plaintiff's Motion to File Supplemental Evidence is DENIED; (2) Defendant Hester's Motion to Strike is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Sur-reply is STRICKEN; and (3) Defendant Hester's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Qualified Immunity is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Hester in his individual capacity are DISMISSED. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 10/18/2022) (lkw)
|
|
Filing
165
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 154 Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendations. After due consideration and having conducted a de novo review, the Court finds that Plaintiff's objections should be OVERRULED. The Court has f urther conducted an independent review of the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions and finds no error. It is therefore ORDERED that the Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation are hereby ADOPTED as the findings and conclusions of the Court. For the reasons stated therein, the Court ORDERS that all claims asserted against Defendant Tijerina be DISMISSED without prejudice. SO ORDERED. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 3/2/2022) (lkw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
