Guzman v. Rodgers
| Anacleto Noel Guzman |
| Galen Jobe Rodgers |
| 5:2018cv00277 |
| December 4, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| Sam R Cummings |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the Court's Order of even date, It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are dismissed with prejudice as frivolous, and for failure to state a claim. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/7/2018) (krd)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: It is, therefore, ORDERED: (1) Plaintiff's complaint and all claims alleged therein are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a claim. (2) This dismissal shall count as a qualifying dismissal under 28 U.S.C. 1915 and 1915A, 42 U.S.C. 1997e, andAdepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383 (5th Cir. 1996). Plaintiff is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes, he may not proceed informa pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (3) Plaintiff's application to proceed informa pauperis is GRANTED. (4) Any pending motions are denied. Judgment shall be entered accordingly. (Ordered by Senior Judge Sam R Cummings on 12/7/2018) (krd)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Fri Dec 7 14:03:17 CST 2018 (crt) |
| Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bmg) |
| Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bmg) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Anacleto Noel Guzman (bmg) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Galen Jobe Rodgers filed by Anacleto Noel Guzman. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bmg) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4. Tue Dec 4 15:47:06 CST 2018 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Guzman v. Rodgers | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Anacleto Noel Guzman | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Galen Jobe Rodgers | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
