Peoples v. Davis, Director of TDCJ-CID
Christopher Dewayne Peoples |
Warden NFN Arnold and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
5:2019cv00144 |
July 19, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
Sam R Cummings |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. § 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Mon Aug 5 16:42:06 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 5 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party (bdg) |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. (bdg) |
Filing 3 Certificate of Trust Account by Christopher Dewayne Peoples TDCJ # 01700843. (bdg) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Christopher Dewayne Peoples (bdg) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Christopher Dewayne Peoples. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (bdg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,5. Fri Jul 19 13:26:32 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.