Apex Billing Solutions, LLC v. Starnik Systems, Inc.
Plaintiff: Apex Billing Solutions, LLC
Defendant: Starnik Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 5:2019cv00173
Filed: August 19, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other Contract
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER GRANTING NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Having considered the status of this case and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), the Court finds that Apex's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal is appropriate. It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed without prejudice. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/23/2019) (bmh)
September 20, 2019 Filing 9 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by Apex Billing Solutions, LLC (Davidson, Brad)
August 21, 2019 Filing 8 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 7 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying sealed and/or Ex Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 6 . (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/20/2019) (clf) Modified on 8/21/2019 (bmh). .
August 20, 2019 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Starnik Systems, Inc.. (bmh)
August 19, 2019 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Apex Billing Solutions, LLC. (Davidson, Brad) (Main Document 2 replaced on 8/20/2019) (bmh).
August 19, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Starnik Systems, Inc. filed by Apex Billing Solutions, LLC. (Filing fee $400; Receipt number 0539-10202315) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Davidson, Brad)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Apex Billing Solutions, LLC v. Starnik Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Apex Billing Solutions, LLC
Represented By: Kristen Reid Vander-Plas
Represented By: Brad J Davidson
Represented By: Kristen Vander-Plas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Starnik Systems, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?