Hernandez v. Stroebel
| Joe Hernandez |
| Andrew Stroebel |
| 5:2019cv00177 |
| August 29, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE AND INSTRUCTION TO PRO SE PARTY (zzm) |
| Filing 5 NEW CASE NOTES: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (zzm) |
| Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from District of Texas Eastern; Case Number 1:19-cv-00332. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas should seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. Copy of NEF to be sent US Mail to parties not electronically noticed. |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5,6. Clerk mailed copy of NEF #4 along with document numbers 5 and 6 Thu Aug 29 11:23:58 CDT 2019 (crt) |
| Interdistrict transfer to the Northern District of TX Lubbock Division. (bjc, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 8/29/2019.] |
Filing 3
ORDERED that this civil rights action is transferred to the Lubbock Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Signed by Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn on 8/1/2019. (bjc, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 8/29/2019.]
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against Andrew Stroebel, filed by Joe Hernandez.(bjc, ) (Original filed in 1:19cv310) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 8/29/2019.] |
|
Filing 1
ORDER severing the following claims into two separate civil rights actions pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983: Joe Hernandez v. Andrew Stroebel (Case 1) and Joe Hernandez v. Nolan County, Nolan County Police Department and Sweetwater, Texas (Case 2). Plaintiffs claims against Walker County, Jim Hurst, Walker County Police Department, and Huntsville, Texas will remain in the above-referenced suit.. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 7/31/2019. (bjc, ) (Original filed in 1:19cv310) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 8/29/2019.]
|
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Zack Hawthorn. (bjc, ) [Transferred from Texas Eastern on 8/29/2019.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hernandez v. Stroebel | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Joe Hernandez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Andrew Stroebel | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
