Porras v. Coyle et al
| Sabino Porras |
| Gregory M Coyle and Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. |
| 5:2019cv00202 |
| September 25, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
| James Wesley Hendrix |
| Torts/Pers Inj: Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Compliance filed by Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (O'Dell, Michael) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Joinder of Parties due by 12/2/2019; Amendment of Pleadings due by 12/2/2019; Dispositive Motions due by 5/4/2020. Discovery due by 5/4/2020. Pretrial Order due by 9/21/2020. Jury Trial set for 10/13/2020 09:00 AM in US Courthouse, Courtroom C-216, 1205 Texas Avenue, Lubbock, TX 79401-4091 before Judge James Wesley Hendrix. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/20/2019) (bdg)
|
| Filing 10 Joint STATUS REPORT filed by Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (O'Dell, Michael) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Sabino Porras. (Smith, Davis) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Davis Wade Smith on behalf of Sabino Porras. (Filer confirms contact info in ECF is current.) (Smith, Davis) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER REQUIRING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND REPORT FOR CONTENTS OF SCHEDULING ORDER: Lead counsel for each party and any unrepresented party shall confer at a scheduling conference as soon as practicable, but in any event no later than October 17, 2019. Joint Report shall be filed on or before 10/31/2019. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/4/2019) (bdg)
|
| Filing 6 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (bdg) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Filing Notice of Removal with State Court filed by Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc. (O'Dell, Michael) |
| Filing 4 ADDITIONAL ATTACHMENTS - SUPPLEMENTAL CIVIL COVER SHEET to #1 Notice of Removal by Defendants Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (O'Dell, Michael) Modified text on 9/26/2019 (bdg). |
| Filing 3 INDEX OF MATTERS BEING FILED by Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (O'Dell, Michael) Modified text on 9/26/2019 (bdg). |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (O'Dell, Michael) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL WITH JURY DEMAND from 154th District Court, Lamb County,, case number DCV-20230-19 filed by Gregory M Coyle, Old Dominion Freight Line, Inc.. (Filing fee $400; receipt number 0539-10293075) In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms and Instructions found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit(s) Exhibit A, #2 Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (O'Dell, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
