Garcia v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Rogelio Garcia |
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID |
5:2019cv00222 |
October 21, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court filed by Rogelio Garcia. (bdg) |
Filing 5 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 5:19-CV-222-H consolidated with lead case 5:19-CV-210-H. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 5:19-CV-210-H. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/6/2019) (zzm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Nov 6 17:06:11 CST 2019 (crt) |
Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: The Court finds that Plaintiff should, within 20 days from the date of this order, pay the filing fee of $400.00 or file with the Clerk the following: [X] A signed form application to proceed informa pauperis; and [X] A certified copy of his inmate trust account statement Failure to file the required documents will result in the denial of in forma pauperis status and the dismissal of Plaintiff s complaint for want of prosecution without further notice, unless the filing fee of $400.00 is timely paid. Plaiantiff may obtain a form application to proceed informa pauperis and a certificate of his inmate trust account from the law library at his current prison unit. Deadline to cure the deficiency is 20 days. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/31/2019) (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Oct 31 16:29:22 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID filed by Robelio Garcia. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Mon Oct 21 10:23:29 CDT 2019 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garcia v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rogelio Garcia | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.