Garcia v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Plaintiff: Rogelio Garcia
Defendant: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 5:2019cv00222
Filed: October 21, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: James Wesley Hendrix
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Pet/Other: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 15, 2019 Filing 6 NOTICE to the Court filed by Rogelio Garcia. (bdg)
November 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER CONSOLIDATING CASES: Member case(s) 5:19-CV-222-H consolidated with lead case 5:19-CV-210-H. Member case administratively closed following consolidation. Further docketing should be in lead case 5:19-CV-210-H. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/6/2019) (zzm)
November 6, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:5. Wed Nov 6 17:06:11 CST 2019 (crt)
October 31, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: The Court finds that Plaintiff should, within 20 days from the date of this order, pay the filing fee of $400.00 or file with the Clerk the following: [X] A signed form application to proceed informa pauperis; and [X] A certified copy of his inmate trust account statement Failure to file the required documents will result in the denial of in forma pauperis status and the dismissal of Plaintiff s complaint for want of prosecution without further notice, unless the filing fee of $400.00 is timely paid. Plaiantiff may obtain a form application to proceed informa pauperis and a certificate of his inmate trust account from the law library at his current prison unit. Deadline to cure the deficiency is 20 days. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 10/31/2019) (krr)
October 31, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Oct 31 16:29:22 CDT 2019 (crt)
October 21, 2019 Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr)
October 21, 2019 Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr)
October 21, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID filed by Robelio Garcia. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr)
October 21, 2019 ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3. Mon Oct 21 10:23:29 CDT 2019 (crt)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Garcia v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rogelio Garcia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?