Lewis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
Lather Lewis |
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Director, TDCJ-CID |
5:2020cv00146 |
July 1, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF SERVICE by Director, TDCJ-CID re #8 Order to Show Cause. (bdg) |
Filing 8 Order to Show Cause, Notice, and Instructions to Parties: Respondent is directed to file an answer to Petitioner's petition pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. No extensions. Applicable issues must be raised in the answer filed by Respondent. Respondent shall mail a copy of the answer with a copy of any supporting briefs to the Petitioner or his attorney of record. Respondent shall file a certificate with the Clerk evidencing such service. All records must be filed with the Clerk within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner's response to Respondent's answer to be filed within (30) days from the date shown on Respondent's certificate of service The clerk will electronically serve this order, the petition, and supporting documents to the designee for the Office of the Texas Attorney General. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 8/19/2020) (bdg) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Wed Aug 19 14:32:37 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 7 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY AND ORDER: The Court orders Petitioner to pay the $5.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis and a certificate of his inmate trust account within 30 days from the date of this order. If Petitioner fails to comply with this order, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. Petitioner may obtain the court-approved forms from the law library at his current prison unit. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 7/13/2020) (zzm) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion Petitioner's motion to suspend the rule on copies. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 7/13/2020) (zzm) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:6,7. Mon Jul 13 13:00:34 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Filing 5 MOTION TO SUSPEND RULE ON COPIES PURSUANT TO RULE 2 OF THE F.R.A.P., filed by Lather Lewis. (krr) |
Filing 4 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
Filing 3 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
Filing 2 MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS UNDER 28 U.S.C. 2254 filed by Lather Lewis, RE: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (krr) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Lather Lewis. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,2,3,4,5. Wed Jul 1 14:09:02 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.