Louinis v. Friend
Moises Louinis |
Martin Friend |
5:2020cv00228 |
September 22, 2020 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Prisoner Pet/Habeas Corpus: General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 ORDER: Petitioner filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss his complaint. (Dkt. No. #6 .) The Court finds that Petitioner's motion serves as a self-executing notice of voluntary dismissal under Rule 41(a). The Clerk is directed to close this case and terminate any pending motions. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 11/20/2020) (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:8. Fri Nov 20 12:06:31 CST 2020 (crt) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE filed by Martin Friend re: #5 MOTION to Dismiss (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Martin Friend. (Cruce-Haag-DOJ, Ann) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss 28 U.S.C. 2241(c)(3) Without Prejudice filed by Moises Louinis (lkw) |
Filing 4 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE, NOTICE AND INSTRUCTIONS TO PARTIES: Respondent is directed to file an answer to Petitioner's petition within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order. Applicable issues must be raised in the answer filed by Respondent. No extensions. Respondent shall mail a copy of the answer with a copy of any supporting briefs to the Petitioner or his attorney of record. Respondent shall file a certificate with the Clerk evidencing such service. All records must be filed with the Clerk within sixty (360) days from the date of this Order. Petitioner's response to Respondent's answer to be filed within (30) days from the date shown on Respondent's certificate of service. (Ann Cruc-Haag, AUSA) (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 9/29/2020) (krr) Modified on 9/29/2020 (krr). Modified on 9/30/2020 (krr). |
Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (krr) |
Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. (krr) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Moises Louinis. (Filing fee $5.00; receipt number LU011592) Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (krr) |
***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:1,3. Tue Sep 22 14:11:56 CDT 2020 (crt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Louinis v. Friend | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: Martin Friend | |
Represented By: | Ann Cruce-Haag-DOJ |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Moises Louinis | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.