McDonald v. Head Mercantile Co., Inc. a/k/a Strategic Outsourcing Solutions et al
Joey McDonald |
Head Mercantile Co., Inc. a/k/a Strategic Outsourcing Solutions and James Scharfeld |
5:2021cv00041 |
February 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Texas |
D Gordon Bryant |
James Wesley Hendrix |
Other Statutes: Other Statutory Actions |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Before the Court is Joey McDonaid's Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(l)(A)(i). Dkt. No. #10 . The Notice of Dismissal is approved. It is ordered that that Joey McDonald's claims against Head Mercantile Co., Inc. and James Scharfeld are dismissed with prejudice, and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. The parties shall each bear their own costs and attorney's fees. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 3/8/2021) (krr) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Dismissal filed by Joey McDonald (Halvorsen, Joel) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to James Scharfeld ; served on 2/23/2021. (Halvorsen, Joel) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Head Mercantile Co., Inc. a/k/a Strategic Outsourcing Solutions ; served on 2/23/2021. (Halvorsen, Joel) |
Filing 7 ORDER Before the Court is Joey McDonald's Motion For Leave to Proceed Without Local Counsel. Dkt. No. #3 . For the reasons stated in the motion, the motion is granted. (Ordered by Judge James Wesley Hendrix on 2/22/2021) (krr) |
Magistrate Judge D. Gordon Bryant, Jr. no longer assigned to case. Pursuant to Special order 3-251 this case should not be referred and this case was referred due to clerical error. (krr) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to James Scharfeld. (krr) (Main Document 6 replaced on 2/18/2021) (krr). |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Head Mercantile Co., Inc. a/k/a Strategic Outsourcing Solutions. (krr) (Main Document 5 replaced on 2/18/2021) (krr). |
Filing 4 New Case Notes: A filing fee has been paid. CASREF case referral set and case referred to Magistrate Judge Bryant (see Special Order 3). Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. (krr) |
Filing 3 MOTION Proceed without Local Counsel filed by Joey McDonald (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Motion for Leave to Proceed without Local Counsel) (Halvorsen, Joel) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS/DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Joey McDonald. (Halvorsen, Joel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT WITH JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Joey McDonald. (Filing fee $402; Receipt number 0539-11614710) Clerk to issue summons(es). In each Notice of Electronic Filing, the judge assignment is indicated, and a link to the # Judges Copy Requirements and # Judge Specific Requirements is provided. The court reminds the filer that any required copy of this and future documents must be delivered to the judge, in the manner prescribed, within three business days of filing. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (Attachments: #1 Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit(s) A) (Halvorsen, Joel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.